Thursday, June 01, 2006

The tangled web of US 'intelligence'


The following analysis was written by Tom Engelhardt for The Asia Times Online:

In recent months, among other uproars and scandals, Americans learned:

That the Defense Department has been collecting intelligence on and tracking domestic anti-war activists.

That, since 2001, the National Security Agency (NSA) has had a presidentially authorized, law-breaking, warrantless surveillance program to listen in on the international phone calls of possibly tens of thousands of US citizens.

That, with the help of three of the four major US telephone companies, it also has had a data-mining operation - "the largest database ever assembled in the world" - linked, in at least on
case, directly into a major telecommunication carrier's network core ("where all its data are stored"), giving it access to almost all telephone calls made in the United States.

That, as director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Porter Goss, a President George W Bush-appointed, Vice President Dick Cheney-backed ex-congressman, had whipped out his lie detector and conducted an internal war and purge of an agency viewed by the administration as little better than the axis of evil, tearing its upper ranks apart via numerous resignations and retirements.

That, meanwhile, Goss's third in command, a fellow with the evocative name of Kyle "Dusty" Foggo (think: fog o' intelligence), was being investigated for possibly granting illegal agency sweetheart contracts to a pal already involved in another major Washington corruption scandal (and don't even get me started on those poker games and prostitutes).

That Goss, in turn, was pushed out of the CIA by Director of National Intelligence (DNI) John Negroponte, head of a new uber-intelligence "office" (ODNI) meant to coordinate the whole sprawling "intelligence community", and his second in command, air force General Michael Hayden, the former head of the NSA (who oversaw those surveillance and data-mining operations for the administration).

That the president then nominated the active-duty general to take Goss's place as the head of the country's major civilian spy agency - in his Senate hearings, he would offer the following comment on Goss's tenure: "You get a lot more authority when the workforce doesn't think it's amateur hour on the top floor."
That Republican and Democratic senators, having questioned the credibility of a military man who had overseen a patently illegal surveillance program on US citizens for years and then defended it vigorously, promptly collapsed in a non-oppositional heap of praise, and rubber-stamped him director by a vote of 78-15.

That in the ever-upward-rippling CIA-agent-outing case of Valerie Plame - about which a stonewalling Goss said, while still head of the House Intelligence Committee, "Somebody sends me a blue dress and some DNA, I'll have an investigation" - rumors of Karl Rove's indictment continued to circulate; while special counsel Patrick Fitzgerald reserved the right to call the vice president, whose office seems ever more in his sightlines, to testify in former aide I Lewis "Scooter" Libby's trial next year.

All this news involving what we call "intelligence" - and much more - played out on the front pages of US newspapers and on television, replete with copious leaks from within the intelligence community, threats from the White House to prosecute journalists reporting those leaks, outraged press editorials about sundry intelligence topics, and a great deal of heat and noise.

Each scandal came and went, the news spotlight flickering from one to the next; and yet, as Hayden's testimony before the Senate made clear, just about no one seemed to have the urge to ask the obvious "what's it all about, Alfie?" question. Nobody wondered what this thing called "intelligence", over which so many tens of thousands of analysts, code breakers and agents labor with so many tens of billions of the United States' dollars, really is; what sort of knowledge about the planet all those acronymic intelligence organizations really deliver.

The value of the "intelligence community" to deliver this thing called "intelligence", whatever mistakes or missteps might be made, is simply taken for granted. >>>More

No comments: